<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adgator&#8217;s advertising reach soars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-adgator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-adgator/</link>
	<description>South African and Global internet startup news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charl Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-adgator/comment-page-1/#comment-42747</link>
		<dc:creator>Charl Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-ninth-largest-publisher-in-sa/#comment-42747</guid>
		<description>Doh! Obviously, I mixed Afrigator and Adgator - sorry!

Fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh! Obviously, I mixed Afrigator and Adgator &#8211; sorry!</p>
<p>Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Hartman</title>
		<link>http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-adgator/comment-page-1/#comment-42663</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-ninth-largest-publisher-in-sa/#comment-42663</guid>
		<description>Charl. Just to clarify. Adgator only has 343 blogs in total. We don&#039;t have thousands serving ads, just the selected few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charl. Just to clarify. Adgator only has 343 blogs in total. We don&#8217;t have thousands serving ads, just the selected few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charl Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-adgator/comment-page-1/#comment-42661</link>
		<dc:creator>Charl Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-ninth-largest-publisher-in-sa/#comment-42661</guid>
		<description>Thanks Justin

@Niel - IOL, News24 .. etc has double the traffic of all the blogs on Adgator - not just the top 343

News24 and IOL are the only local brands that consistently reach million uniques +</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Justin</p>
<p>@Niel &#8211; IOL, News24 .. etc has double the traffic of all the blogs on Adgator &#8211; not just the top 343</p>
<p>News24 and IOL are the only local brands that consistently reach million uniques +</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Hartman</title>
		<link>http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-adgator/comment-page-1/#comment-42660</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-ninth-largest-publisher-in-sa/#comment-42660</guid>
		<description>Charl, yes you&#039;re spot on with your summary. 

Richard, it is somewhat skewed and we&#039;re working with the OPA to resolve this. The most important thing for us is to get the demographics and audited stats because we&#039;re selling off this inventory. So, while blogs are not under our ownership the onus is on us to use the blog inventory to sell off that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charl, yes you&#8217;re spot on with your summary. </p>
<p>Richard, it is somewhat skewed and we&#8217;re working with the OPA to resolve this. The most important thing for us is to get the demographics and audited stats because we&#8217;re selling off this inventory. So, while blogs are not under our ownership the onus is on us to use the blog inventory to sell off that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-adgator/comment-page-1/#comment-42656</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-ninth-largest-publisher-in-sa/#comment-42656</guid>
		<description>Are we saying IOL is about twice as popular as 343 of SA&#039;s best blogs combined?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we saying IOL is about twice as popular as 343 of SA&#8217;s best blogs combined?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-adgator/comment-page-1/#comment-42655</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-ninth-largest-publisher-in-sa/#comment-42655</guid>
		<description>I see. Is this not creating a false reading on Nielsens to some extent however? This would be like Doubleclick claiming to have 400million impressions (as site visits) when in fact they are merely serving ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see. Is this not creating a false reading on Nielsens to some extent however? This would be like Doubleclick claiming to have 400million impressions (as site visits) when in fact they are merely serving ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charl Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-adgator/comment-page-1/#comment-42652</link>
		<dc:creator>Charl Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-ninth-largest-publisher-in-sa/#comment-42652</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Richard&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adgator&#039;s audience reach is the 9th biggest in SA because of their ability to serve ads on all the blogs in SA (who has joined their network)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Its not their traffic/audience to Afrigator/Adgator but their advertising reach&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their press release is confusing but I think I made sense of it &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They need demographics for their advertising network to sell to advertisers - thats why they use Nielsens to track the impressions&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard</p>
<p>Adgator&#8217;s audience reach is the 9th biggest in SA because of their ability to serve ads on all the blogs in SA (who has joined their network)</p>
<p>Its not their traffic/audience to Afrigator/Adgator but their advertising reach</p>
<p>Their press release is confusing but I think I made sense of it </p>
<p>They need demographics for their advertising network to sell to advertisers &#8211; thats why they use Nielsens to track the impressions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-adgator/comment-page-1/#comment-42650</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bandwidthblog.com/2009/02/11/afrigator-ninth-largest-publisher-in-sa/#comment-42650</guid>
		<description>So are you saying that Afrigator is the ninth biggest audience in SA because of other people&#039;s blogs, not the Afrigator or Adgator sites? Is this not skewed then, because the Neilsens tracking is not reflecting actual visits to Afrigator or Adgator but in fact visits to other people&#039;s sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are you saying that Afrigator is the ninth biggest audience in SA because of other people&#8217;s blogs, not the Afrigator or Adgator sites? Is this not skewed then, because the Neilsens tracking is not reflecting actual visits to Afrigator or Adgator but in fact visits to other people&#8217;s sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
