Popular Now: The new XBOX ONE: A 360º view

Share This!

In my opinion: Is the iPad invincible?

Published by on Aug 15th, 2012, 12 Comments

Since its introduction in 2010, the Apple iPad has been the premium tablet on the market. Still comprising more than 68% of all tablets sold today, the iPad seems to be getting stronger and stronger. With so many other options on the market, why would the majority of people keep flocking towards the Jobs brainchild? Since Apple created the new segment in the market, it has been interesting to see how it has evolved and how other manufacturers have entered the market, some more successfully than others. What is interesting is that the idea of a tablet PC as we know it today has actually been around since the turn of the century, but it took Apple to popularize it.

First Prototype

The first tablet PC as we know them today actually came to the fore in 2000. Now, that is a long period of time until the iPad’s launch in 2010. If you look at the first prototype below, you can probably see why.

Yes, it was actually Microsoft that conceptualised the idea of a personalized computer as a small, mobile device that can do almost anything your huge, chunky desktop can. Not the prettiest piece of technology you have ever seen, right? That is certainly a factor, but also, the technology required to cram so much performance into such a miniscule package had not yet existed. Sure, the prototypes were fully operational, but the functionality needed to make the device really useful was not there yet.

It begs the question: why did Microsoft lose faith in the idea? Could they have not waited until the technology existed (or created it themselves) and try again? Surely they missed a massive opportunity. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, isn’t it, Microsoft?

So why is the iPad so dominant? Aren’t the other tablets any good? Is it their marketing? Don’t they have comparable capabilities? Is it just because the iPad is an Apple product? Is the general public not very well informed and so don’t know any better? Well, to some extent it is all of these factors. Let’s take a look at what people look for in tablet computers, and why it’s mostly the iPad that seems to fit this criteria.

Hardware

While most of the tablet owners in the world don’t know exactly what is going on inside the tablet and what lies beneath to give them good performance, the hardware is still an important factor. Although the terms “A5 processor”, “Tegra 3”, “Exynos 5250 chip”, “BSI camera” and the like might not mean much for many people, they still know that most of the time bigger is better. So, for the lucky people who can afford a high-end tablet, they can always go for a proper performing tablet.

Certainly, Apple holds its own in this regard. The screen is something special, and other manufacturers have taken notice. The Apple processors are on par with most on the market, but by no means the best. The next iPad will probably be substantially beefed up in this regard, as the new iPad was not much of an improvement over the iPad2. So what can competitors offer?

  • Microsoft: The Surface tablet will be interesting to watch. We are not yet sure of the hardware, but the illuminating keyboard in the cover is a brilliant idea.
  • ASUS: The Transformer Prime is the best Android tablet available in the country at present. It has stunning performance specs and a beautiful screen. The Nexus 7 is also an interesting prospect, having great specs for a low price and stock Android. Whether it will be coming to SA remains to be seen.
  •  Samsung: The hardware in their tablets has always been decent, but we are excited to see the upcoming P10 tablet. It uses the brand new Exynos 5250 1.7 GHz chip, said to perform about 1.5 – 2 times better than the Tegra 3 and quad-core Snapdragon processors, and has 2GB of RAM. Most impressively, it has a 2560 x 1600 resolution screen, easily beating the retina display of the iPad (2048 x 1536).

User Experience

The way the operating system of a tablet performs is arguably even more important than its hardware specs. This is the iPad’s true strength, as it is almost always seamlessly smooth and fluid, no matter what you are doing with it. There are those that believe the operating system is too rigid and doesn’t allow for much personalization, but for most people that is not an issue.

That all comes down to taste of course, but in terms of smooth performance, it’s my honest opinion that nothing is as good today (even though I love my Galaxy Tab) as an Apple iPad. That is likely to change pretty soon, though. The newest ASUS tablets are running Ice Cream Sandwich, which is a big improvement on the previous versions of Android. And so, there should be some competition for the iPad in the near future.

  •  Android: Google has recently released the latest version of their open source operating system, 4.1 Jelly Bean. To be quite frank, it’s a major upgrade for the operating system, and makes the experience on both smartphones and tablets immensely improved. We look forward to seeing new tablets released with Jelly Bean (like the P10 previously mentioned).
  • Microsoft: Windows 8 is set to be a huge enhancement. Already, demos of the operating system on tablets is creating quite a buzz, but we won’t be completely convinced until we get our hands on it.
  • Blackberry (wait, Blackberry make tablets, who knew?): The Playbook is far from being a valid competitor.

Brand Names and Fashion

Whether you like it or not, it will always play a huge part in retail. Trends will always be present, and certainly Apple is a huge trendsetter. To the general public, Apple is ‘cool’ and only make good products. Luckily, people are becoming more ‘techno-literate’ and have a better understanding of products, how they work, and what makes them good or bad.

Until recently (and probably still in some cases), if you asked someone in the general public why their Apple device is better than anything else, you would probably get a reply along the lines of: “Because it’s Apple, they’re just better.” That’s what trends tend to do. Of course, it needs to be a good quality product to acquire that status in the first place.

The only manufacturer that has been able to replicate this kind of trend in their devices in recent times has been Samsung, with the Galaxy S smartphones. The SII did brilliantly and now the SIII is truly a trendy item to own and show off. In the tablet market though, no one has been able to get the same status attached to their devices. It also has to do with design of course, as it needs to be a pretty device. The iPad does fit that description, as most of the public agrees.

Invincible?

Is the iPad invincible? In the short-term, it’s most likely. One of two things is going to happen before that changes. Someone is going to have to make a vastly superior product (some would argue there already are), or the tablet also has to become a fashion statement like the iPad. The market is being flooded with so many devices these days, it will take something special for someone to really stand out from the crowd. Whether you are an Apple die-hard or not, the sales figures are truly impressive, as is the device.

We as consumers should be happy that there are so many devices out there, because competition breeds innovation and improved technology. Whether its innovation, fashion or lack of competition which keeps Apple at the helm, or whether someone will truly challenge them soon, remains to be seen. I for one can’t wait to see how things develop and what is presented to the consumer in the coming months and years.

What would you like your tablet to do in the future? Let us know in the comments below.

Follow Theunis on Twitter at @TvR_Pion.

Comments

  • Paul

    Please substantiate your statement, that the PlayBook is far from being a valid competitor.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=701295683 Theunis Jansen Van Rensburg

    Well first of all, the sales have been horrid since launch. Secondly, the OS it uses is very laggy and bugged. It offers users no solid experience, and lacks many features you would expect in today’s market.

  • http://www.facebook.com/rvanvuren Riaan Jansen Van Vuren

    Dont agree with the authors view on the Blackberry Playbook. Have a look at the following article on the recently released 4G LTE version of the Playbook if you dont believe me – http://betanews.com/2012/08/10/4g-lte-blackberry-playbook-makes-ios-and-android-devices-feel-about-as-sophisticated-as-my-daughters-old-speak-spell/
    In the words of the author – “With a faster CPU/GPU (1.5GHz dual-core TI OMAP 4460) and a fully-baked RTOS that makes iOS and Android devices feel about as sophisticated as my daughter’s old “Speak & Spell”, the new PlayBook dances circles around the competition — for example, delivering a SunSpider score (1397) that even the formidable Nexus 7 can’t touch.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=701295683 Theunis Jansen Van Rensburg

    The hardware is not the Playbook’s problem, its easy to stick decent specs into a tablet. One of the problems is the OS, the Playbook OS was not very good to use, until they released the Blackberry 10 OS, which helps a lot. The biggest problem though, is that Blackberry don’t have developer support and their app store is barren and devoid of enough good content.

  • Richard James

    I would suggest that you are very uninformed about the Playbook and have probably not used it much, if at all. Firstly, the OS has been updated and is not buggy. Second, try multitasking on a Playbook, jumping from email to website, and back to email (as an example) and you’ll find the Playbook runs circles around the competition. Last but not least. Do some proper research. The 4G device is not totally dependent on LTE and will work effectively on 3G networks.
    All in all your article shows the usual blinkered snobby attitude of Apple sheep to all other brands.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=701295683 Theunis Jansen Van Rensburg

    Hi, thanks for you comment. I actually have used the Playbook, and as stated above, the OS was extremely buggy until it was updated to the Blackberry OS 10. And yes, the 4G device will work on a 3G network, but you will get no advantage over a 3G device, that was my point. An LTE enabled device will give you no quicker performance than a 3G device. Also, as stated, the biggest problem with BB is that they have no developer support. Their market is a cesspool of nothingness compared to the competition.

    If you think I have an Apple bias, you completely misinterpreted the article. I actually prefer the Android platform to iOS, as I believe it gives you much more functionality. By no means do I think the iPhone is in any way or form better than what Android can offer, I think there are better phones. But the point of the article was to comment on Apple’s market dominance in the tablet arena. I have personally used a lot of different tablets, and I can tell you that overall the iPad experience is superior at this stage (as much as I wouldn’t like that to be true).

  • Ryan

    I’m afraid, that you have proved Richard’s point Theunis. The PlayBook does not, and at the moment can not run BB10. BB10 is not available in any form yet. The BB10 Dev Alpha, which is the device that has been given out at the BB10 Jam World Tours, runs a scaled down version of the PlayBook’s QNX os. The PlayBook is currently on os2, and os2.1 is currently in a beta version. So therefore you have not been able to install BB10 on your PlayBook, although when BB10 launches the PlayBook will be able to upgrade to it,

    Also in regards to apps, BB10Jam has totally changed Developers attitudes towards RIM. The event has been packed at all its stops across the globe. 13% of app developers with RIM make in excess of $100 000 a year; it is the 2nd most profitable app centre after Apple; in the 4th quarter off last year they had an increase of 21% for App World and 240% for the PlayBook; an increase of 68% in app developers; 3,000,000,000 apps have been downloaded and the rate that they are being downloaded is increasing continually; 177,000,000 apps are downloaded a month (about 6 million a day). When you look at those, App World isn’t doing too badly.

  • Ryan

    Sorry Theunis, but is there a reason why my comment appears to have been removed as I don’t seem to see it any more. It was there earlier? Thanks

  • Theunis Jansen van Rensburg

    Hi Ryan. Yes sorry, I apologize, I actually meant it was running Playbook OS 2.0. Thanks for that!

    I understand what you are saying about the apps, but the problem in more the quality of apps. It is the same problem that hindered Android a couple of years ago. There are hundreds of thousands of apps, but the overall quality of the apps are extremely low. Most of the ‘big’ developing companies aren’t going near the Blackberry market, but that is hopefully soon to change. There’s still a lot missing from the BlackBerry PlayBook, and the main part of it is apps. Perhaps adding support for Android apps will solve this eventually, but it hasn’t yet. There are still huge holes when it comes to services that are rapidly becoming standard for tablets, both for fun and productivity. Where are Dropbox and Netflix? From RIM’s comments, it sounds like standalone BBM support is on its way, but it’s still a big sticking point for BlackBerry regulars. Across the board, the BlackBerry PlayBook is full of parts that are good, but those parts are too few. Its limitations mean that it’s not up to par as either a productivity tablet or a fun one.

  • Theunis Jansen van Rensburg

    Hi, I’m looking into it. I can see it in the back end.

  • Ryan

    Hi Theunis, I’m sorry but you have proven Richards point. The BlackBerry PlayBook, and indeed no device (available to the public) runs BB10 currently. YesThorsten Heins has one, as I’m sure a few special employess at RIM do. Not even the BB10 Dev Alpha device is running BB10, it is running a scaled down version of QNX (the PlayBooks operating system, which has been in existance for 30 odd years, and can be found in 1000′s of car models). The PlayBook is currently on os2.0, with 2.1 in the beta stage and available to those who register their device for it. 2.1 will hopefully be available to the public shortly.
    In regards to your comments about App World, are you aware that apps increased by in excess of 20% in the 4th quarter last year. The PlayBooks apps increased by 240%, yes I’m sure the Android App Player helped. 13% of BlackBerry Developers make $100,000.00 or more a year. It has 6,000,000.00 downloads a day, with only 70,000 apps. Thats 180,000,000 a month. Overall in the 4th quarter App Worlds apps increased by more that 40%. App World is the 2nd most profitable App Store after Apple. Apps that are downloaded by BlackBerry users are used more, and kept on a device longer than other os’.

  • Theunis Jansen van Rensburg

    Hi Ryan. Yes sorry, I apologize, I actually meant it was running Playbook OS 2.0. Thanks for that!
    I understand what you are saying about the apps, but the problem in more the quality of apps. It is the same problem that hindered Android a couple of years ago. There are hundreds of thousands of apps, but the overall quality of the apps are extremely low. Most of the ‘big’ developing companies aren’t going near the Blackberry market, but that is hopefully soon to change. There’s still a lot missing from the BlackBerry PlayBook, and the main part of it is apps. Perhaps adding support for Android apps will solve this eventually, but it hasn’t yet. There are still huge holes when it comes to services that are rapidly becoming standard for tablets, both for fun and productivity. Where are Dropbox and Netflix? From RIM’s comments, it sounds like standalone BBM support is on its way, but it’s still a big sticking point for BlackBerry regulars. Across the board, the BlackBerry PlayBook is full of parts that are good, but those parts are too few. Its limitations mean that it’s not up to par as either a productivity tablet or a fun one.
    (Don’t know why the other comments aren’t showing, I can see them in the back end, but not here. Looking into it.)

http://www.bandwidthblog.com/wp-content/themes/cnnetwork