Popular Now: The new XBOX ONE: A 360º view

Share This!

iLost: Why Apple dropping Google Maps was premature

Published by on Sep 27th, 2012, 8 Comments

Apple and Google are interesting companies to compare. Obviously, in terms of size and profitability they both tick the right boxes. For years they have been partners and that partnership has been very successful in creating profits for both parties. But times change and so does business, probably nowhere quicker than in the information and technology sector. In recent years there has been a drastic shift in these companies from partners to rivals, and there are bound to be some casualties when this happens.

Both companies constantly change their strategies en objectives and always have to weigh up the ‘goldilocks’ zone in terms of cooperation. In other words, as the balance shifts from pure partnerships to a new rivalry, they don’t want too little cooperation where they don’t maximize profits; nor do they want too much cooperation where the part of the other company that has become their rival knows too much. No, they want the amount of cooperation to be just right, like Goldilocks described the porridge.

That is all good and well, and obviously I have no idea of the inner workings of Apple or Google, but one fact remains: consumers should never be disadvantaged because of the changes in strategy. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what happened with Apple introducing their own mapping solution instead of sticking with Google’s in the recent release of iOS6.

Now that the Apple iPhone5 has been unleashed to consumers and more and more people and publications are getting their hands on it, there seems to be some reoccurring themes in all of them. The Apple Maps service is not up to scratch. Let me begin by showing some funny mistakes on Apple Maps:

-          Manhattan has apparently been moved to Brooklyn and the Helsinki railway station is in someone’s yard.

-          A very interesting bridge has been built within a week.

-          Berlin shall from now on be situated in Antarctica.

In my opinion, Apple made a huge mistake dropping Google Maps at this stage. They have a very loyal following and the last thing they would want is to alienate their customers. There are those conspiracy theorists that say Google decided not to support Apple anymore, but that doesn’t make any sense. Google obviously get huge royalties from Apple using its impressive mapping system. But it’s not all about the money.

There are millions of iPhone users out there, and whenever their Maps is connected to the internet, Google receives all the precious information most of its business is built upon. I believe that is why Apple made this decision. While I can understand it, it was certainly not the right time to do so. Apple is basically screwing its customers out of the best experience possible because they don’t want to help Google improve Google Maps anymore.

Funnily enough, Google is doing the exact opposite lately. They are releasing as many apps that use their services on iOS. Apple let Google take control of the YouTube app, and Google totally overhauled it and made it superior in every way. Google also released a great Google+ app and most recently released an iOS version of Google Drive that has all the capabilities that its Android counterpart has.

Of course Google is doing this to get as many people using their services as possible, so Apple allowing these apps on the App Store boosts Google’s revenue, but that doesn’t matter. Apple allowed it because those apps make the iOS experience, and more importantly, the iPhone experience better. Apple’s Maps on the other hand, does not. It’s not only the strange mistakes I showed above, but also simply a lack of information. Look how the information differs for the same locations.

-          San Francisco University (which map would be useful for a student or visiting parent)

-          San Francisco International (Apple’s map shows no detail whatsoever)

I have no doubt that Apple can catch up, but that could take years. That’s years of iPhone users forced into using an inferior product because Apple wants to limit Google’s access to iOS as much as possible. Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt recently spoke in Japan, and basically said that Apple would have to beg Google to release a version of its app on iOS. He further added “we think it would have been better if they had kept our app. But what do I know?”

One thing is for sure, battles between platforms are bad for innovation. The Apple vs. Android lawsuits is dragging on, with no end in sight. But rarely before has this had a direct impact on the end user, like it does here. Customers are being punished by Apple’s decision to cut Google Maps from iOS. This decision should have waited a couple of years until they could offer a product that does not hinder the customer’s experience, in my opinion.

Let us know what you think in the comments below.

Pictures source: Cnet

Comments

  • Stephen

    Theunis, do yourself a favour and read http://daringfireball.net/2012/09/get_the_fainting_chair on why culling Google Maps wasn’t optional

  • Theunis Jansen van Rensburg

    Hi Stephen. I don’t agree with you, it was optional. Apple should have gone for option two in the link you posted. As I said in the post above also, number two in the link says:

    #2 would grant Google — now Apple’s archrival — more branding, more control, and more access to user data on Apple’s platform.

    But I believe they should have rather done that for at least another year instead of delivering a sub-par experience to consumers.

  • http://twitter.com/adielslarmie Adiel Slarmie

    Stephen, I agree with the Gruber piece as well.

    But I think there’s an over reaction for the most part…Remember the Antennae issue? Turns out it affected a relatively small group of people, but the (same) press made it seem like reception on an iPhone4 is horrific for everyone. This article too doesn’t even give first hand experience of quality of map data….it just rehashes stuff off CNET (Theunis: if the maps work in SA i really couldn’t care about the brooklyn Bridge or San Fran university), The people who are happy with maps aren’t raving about it or writing articles about. Negative press is more sensational!

    I also think its a bit of a departure for Apple ito giving clients the best experience possible(at least in the short term). So agree with you on that Theunis. i think long term it may prove worthwhile though Checkout: http://gizmodo.com/5946425/the-new-apple-it-doesnt-just-work

  • Theunis Jansen van Rensburg

    Hi Adiel. Thanks for the comments. I have had personal experience with it, I just wasn’t able to get the proper screenshots. And let me assure you, the problem is worse in SA. It’s not meant to be negative or sensational, I was simply commenting on the Apple strategy regarding the product. I’m sure there are people who are happy with it, but that’s not the point. Compared to what is available, its not up to par.

    The whole point of the post is to note that the decision is premature, not that it shouldn’t be done at all. I believe the companies should and want to provide the best possible experiences for consumers, and that’s why the time wasn’t right to do it on Apple’s part.

  • Stephen

    Theunis — what I think I’m actually trying to say is that I’d definitely go with Gruber’s option #3 if I were Tim Cook. I don’t think the impact in the short term is bigger than the impact of not doing it now in the long term. So I would like to agree to disagree with you.

  • Stephen
  • http://twitter.com/adielslarmie Adiel Slarmie

    Ja, that was pretty poor on their part, but i still find their writing pretty entertaining…I struggle to find decent tech writers that aren’t apple biased. Topolsky, McCracken, Mossberg, Siegler and Gruber are all good (latter 2 are very apple biased though). Any suggestions?

  • http://twitter.com/adielslarmie Adiel Slarmie

    thanks Theunis. Swak that the results are poor in SA…Hopefully it will be ok in Cape Town!

    To your point on timing, I think perhaps they got to a point where the only way to improve their product is through crowdsourced data which they can only get once they’re live. Google Maps was riddled with bugs, but after 5 years of data they’ve built an awesome product.

    Doesn’t justify the poor experience, but perhaps they’re willing to put up with the short term pain on a bigger long term bet.

http://www.bandwidthblog.com/wp-content/themes/cnnetwork